Upon entering Wilson's Promontory I was intrigued by the fact that the right side of the road was quite black from fire and the left was unscathed. Simon later told me it was deliberately set and proceeded to tell me what he knew of controlled burning in this area. I was impressed that I could virtually see research being done, but even more amazed to discover later on that it was being done by some of my peers-Melbourne Uni Botony students. I wanted to learn more about fire management and how it will effect the Prom, so I did a little research.

      Aborigines have inhabited Wilson's Promontory for at least 6000 years and they used fire for many purposes including amusement, signaling, to clear ground to facilitate travel, hunting, regeneration of food for both humans and kangaroos, and expanding human habitat. It is estimated that fire swept through this area annually at this time. The early 1800's brought the arrival of white European colonizers who exploited the land via fishing, sealing, whaling, mining, logging and clearing the forest in order to graze animals. They did not permit natural fires to run their course and surely did not light any themselves, nor would they allow the Aborigines to perform what they called 'firestick farming' on their property in case the fire escaped and burned down some crop land.

       The Prom was first reserved in 1898 but exploitation continued to the extent that the park was closed and became an army training center in 1941. In 1951 a fire burned down 75 percent of the park, the exact occurrence the Aborigines were trying to avoid by lighting many small, low-intensity fires. Needless to say, the landscape of the Prom and the whole east coast of Australia has changed dramatically from what the journals of Joseph Banks describe as he sailed up the coast in 1770. In the past fifty years a noticeable change has occurred in Wilson's Promontory. In the 1960's Leptospermum laevigatum (L. laevigatum) migrated from the tall shrublands on the landward side of the coastal dunes to the inner heathlands, creating a canopy that suppressed the natural heath beneath it. Similarly in the 1970's Kunzea ambigua (K. ambigua) invaded the heaths as it moved from the elevated granite outcrops inland from the heaths. It also was choking out the native vegetation, resulting in a decrease in species diversity and richness. In 1990 a research project commenced via the collaboration of The Department of Conservation and Natural Resources and the School of Botany at Uni Melbourne. Today the project is hosted by the School of Botany and Parks Victoria. The purpose is to test the ability of the heath to revert to its more natural state. Given that both invading species are obligate seeders and are killed by fire, it was proposed that two fires would eradicate the invading species and allow the native flora to flourish.

      Quadrants containing the invading species were demarcated and burnings took place in both 1991 and 1999. Some were burned both years, others were only burnt once, and a control site was left untouched. This year was the eleventh year that data has been collected at these sites. L. laevigatum and K. ambigua were supposed to be eradicated after the two successive burns, but the data from this year does not definitively show this. In most plots the species have at least one to five percent canopy cover, not quite dominating but definitely not eliminated. However, the number of native species has increased overall, utilizing their barren native soil created from the burns. It's hard to predict whether or not the invading species will continue to be held in check or increase in canopy cover and density over time.

       Another research project being conducted by Chesterfield et al. studied the impact of grazing on grassland composition on the Yanakie Isthmus of Wilson's Prom. In their studies they excluded natural grazers (kangaroos, rabbits, and wombats) from test sites in areas where well-grassed woodlands were converted to closed shrub due to a serious L. laevigatum invasion. They concluded that such areas would revert to a predominately indigenous plant population within four years if all herbivore predators were controlled, giving the native species the ability to flourish and exclude the introduced species. It's implementations could be difficult and detrimental to the aesthetics of the park because it would probably require extensive fencing; though the fences would only be needed for a relatively short period of time, hence it could be a good long term solution. This novel idea could also be used in conjunction with burning as a method of invasion control. Reducing the amount of grazing would ensure that there's enough biomass for burning and that, after the burn, the herbivores won't consume all of the new growth.

       Although I'm not a botany major and didn't understand all of the management theories I read about, I learned a lot in the bit of research I did. I admit that I was surprised to learn that the green dense heathland that most Prom visitors think is healthy and aesthetically pleasing is actually very detrimental to the park. My generation has been taught the Smokey the Bear mentality: that fire is bad, very bad. It's hard to change this mind set, but I noticed there was mention of this research project in the Prom brochure. The more publicity it gets, the more people will understand and be patient. Unfortunately the Prom has a long way to go before it's back to its natural state, and it will probably look worse before it looks better, but I'm relieved to know that work is being done and that one day people will get to see Wilson's Promontory as the Aborigines did.

[ BACK ]

Home | Journal Entries | Photo Features | Oral Presentation | Links | Site Map

The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author.
The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.