Robert's
Picks: Disappointing Films |

The
Matrix Reloaded, dir. the Wachowski brothers (2003).
The film is more about what is means to be cool
than anything else. The long priest-like
robes worn by the main characters, the cool names of the principals—Neo, Trinity,
and Morpheus (which remind me of the late 20th century penchant for
renaming oneself in order to claim an identity), the cool sunglasses everyone
wears, the cool weapons everyone fires at everyone else, the cool martial arts
moves (aided by digitally erased wires), the cool sets (rusted metal, I suppose,
the bankruptcy of industrialization and globalization), the artificial and pompous
speech patterns of the principals (if you speak that way, you must be saying something
important), the cool ideas about purpose, meaning, fate, change (as if just talking
about big ideas is supposed to mean you “have” big ideas), the cool love scene
between Neo and Trinity (a perfect kiss, a perfect union, a perfect orgasm)—well,
the list goes on. And I was mostly bored by it. I don’t really care what the Matrix is or what
is supposed to mean, because there is no thread of meaning one can unwind from
any beginning to any end. I’ve heard the
spirituality talk in the film referred to as mumbo jumbo, and I would concur.
The film seems to consist of relentlessly boring and uninspired action
sequences combined with endlessly talky and boring scenes where characters pontificate
about big ideas like change, identity, and one’s purpose in life. The latter scenes seemed a remake of those scenes in The Phantom
Menace that were equally boring. These
scenes ground the film to a halt. Nothing
is more boring that watching authority figures yelling at each other.
That rule of filmmaking has been the downfall of many a television drama
about great historical figures.
I found it
noteworthy that the majority of main characters in the film were African American—Morpheus,
his copilot, his rival, a former lover who is now with his rival, and the oracle. Those five characters are balanced by four other powerful characters—Neo,
Trinity, a counselor, and the architect. Despite
this balance, the ones with the greatest powers are Neo and Trinity.
I was not moved by this film the way I was moved with the early sections
of The Matrix. When I saw Neo in training in those early scenes,
and watched his interaction with Morpheus, I thought I was watching something
new. Here is a character preparing for
battle and learning the skills of specialized martial arts rather than blowing
people away with big guns. Of course,
all that changed at the end of The Matrix with its shootout in the climactic
scene. But The Matrix Reloaded failed
to move me because its main theme, that love conquers all, was presented with
all of the subtlety of a lead pipe. Perhaps
that’s the way to appeal to younger audiences—that mythic 15-year-old white male
out there whose ticket-buying power runs the industry. The film also played to a stale formula—for example, the idea of
starting the film with a scene that was incomplete and puzzling, and then ending
the film with the same scene and playing it out fully so that now we know what
it means. That’s an old idea, and it did
not work here. All of the special effects
stuff under the earth in the city of Zion or under the earth with the evil octopus-like
critters was boring, a waste of time. A viewing of 2001: A Space Odyssey, should be required for anyone that thought
the special effects in this film were imaginative.
The
one scene that captured my imagination was Neo’s visit to the oracle. She was a lovely old African American woman
sitting on an old park bench in an urban setting; and it was a magical interaction
between them. Why did she get only one
scene? I would have moved that scene to
earlier in the film and got rid of most of the stuff about the humans stuck in
their under earth setting. Oh, but those
scenes were boring! And what to make of
the lovemaking scene between Neo and Trinity as it is crosscut with the provocative
dance number with the rest of the earthlings rubbing up against each other in
a massive conga line? Was this comparison supposed to be intimacy
vs. orgy? Whatever it was, it seemed offensive
to me. After the scene with the oracle
we have the obligatory digital effects piece de resistance! Neo fights an infinite number of Mr. Smiths,
and the more the scene goes on the more I was bored with its staginess, the
repetitive nature of the martial arts moves, the pounding uninspired sound
effects, and the overall unimaginative construction of the scene.
Every once in a while the scene goes either to slow motion or to a quick
still image: will someone please tell me why that was interesting or unique?
The action scenes in this film were stultifying.
I never became emotionally involved. But
then, does a video game player really become emotionally involved after a while? Don’t they have the same stare as the video
poker player or the pinball-machine player or the roulette-wheel player or the
slot machine player—that dead stare of unanimated longing for something to happen
that will never happen? After all of the
fighting, what does Neo do? He simply
rockets up into space. “He does his Superman
thing,” as one of the characters said earlier.
So why did he fight at all. If
he can’t really destroy the Mr. Smiths, then what is the point of fighting?
I suppose the point is that Neo becomes a program fighting other programs
and thus becomes the star of a video game that is being played for high stakes.
No, scratch that idea.
Now
we have to find the keymaker. Don’t even
ask why. Another uninventive scene. We have lots of posturing. Villains (bad programs) posture. They smirk.
They talk tough. Again, I suppose
that’s for the 15-year-olds. But after
all of the tough talk, what does it matter. Neo makes things happen. There is no tension here. There is no drama here. Just lots of money spent on sets, special effects,
costumes, and sexy guns.
Now
we have the chase scene that is supposed to become as memorable as the chase scenes
from Bullit, The French Connection, and Ronin. Not even close. It reminded me of the chase scenes from T2—lots
of cars crashing, lots of bullets flying, and no one being hit by the bullets.
We have all of the components—shut down a section of the freeway so that
we can have wrong-way traffic, big trucks exploding, fast motorcycles (motorcycles
are sexy to that 15-year-old), lots of special effects.
What is memorable to me is how much I did not believe the special effects
in this scene. And how come every other
person turns into another Mr. Smith. Why don’t we know how that works? Oh, I forgot—I’m watching a video game. Or perhaps I’m supposed to be playing a video game. “We do only that which we are meant to do!”
someone intones. Wow! That was a big idea! But back to the action. Big explosion at the end—and Neo is Superman
to the rescue.
Now
onto the meeting with the architect. Neo
walks through the blinding light into the source—of what? The architect claims that he built the Matrix. He claims that Neo is the 6th incarnation
of Neo. What does all of this mean?
I think it means nothing—it just sounds like it means something.
And we learn that Neo is an anomaly, a kind of mutant, perhaps. Does that mean he is part human and part program?
In the Matrix he acts like a program and does exactly what he is supposed to do—he
always escapes destruction. But then in
one scene we see that he can bleed—just like a human being.
So what am I to think? Then the architect becomes a game-show host
and offers Neo two doors—but each door offers mixed outcomes. One offers Trinity, but at the cost of the
entire human race. In other words, Neo
is responsible for the entire human race. Wait
a minute. I thought Noah was responsible
for the entire human race. I thought God
was responsible for the entire human race. Of course, he chooses the door for Trinity.
We’ll worry about the human race in the next installment.
But I won’t be in the theaters to watch it.
I will remain unplugged from the Matrix.
Northfork, dir. Michael Polish. Pretentious, smug, silly, film-school angles meant to dazzle, boring, a waste of time, overblown, unbelievably bad. The film starts out as some realistic drama relating to a town being moved to higher ground because of a new dam. But then it drops away and tries to become a fable about love, forgiveness, hope, and salvation. How could someone not have seen how bad this film was and tell someone about it? The Polish brothers have immense talent, but their ego-involvement in this film blinded them to the emptiness at the heart of this puppet-show. What a waste of talent.
Once
Upon a Time in the
School
of Rock, dir. Richard Linklater. I have thought of Linklater as one of the bright
lights of independent filmmaking in the past 10 years. But all this film proves is that he is capable
of directing a boring film. Now
Jack Black is a talented actor. But
here he is out of his league. A
comment on the Internet Data Base reads, “Maybe it's not intelligent—but
it's funny and it rocks!” Yes,
it is not intelligent. No, it is not funny.
And no, it does not rock—although it could have if the character
would have been written with more imagination and if the talented kids
who knew how to play their instruments would have been given an opportunity
to really show their stuff. I
was bored, I was disappointed, and I was not impressed with Jack Black’s
one-dimensional performance. He had one speed—10th gear—and it
became tiring after a while. Nothing in the plot was convincing. Nothing in the interactions between Black and
the kids was believable. Nothing
worked for me.
