|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Module
7 |
|
The
History and Evolution of Genres |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genre analysis also includes understanding the evolution of a
genre over time. Genres change and develop because of changes in
the culture or historical period in which the genre is being produced.
The Western solo hero who was popular in the 1940s and 1950s evolved
into the group of heroes in the 1960s and 1970s with Rawhide and
Bonanza—shows that reflected a shift in the workplace to that
of the group in the corporation or company during that time. And,
with the increasing interest in urban crime and international espionage
in the 1970s and 1980s, the Western was replaced by the police/detective
and the spy/thriller genres. |
Genres also gain popularity with certain audiences who seek out
these genres given the historical or cultural forces operating in
a certain period. During the Great Depression, audiences flocked
to movie houses to view Hollywood romantic comedies as a way of
escaping the grim realities of everyday lives characterized by poverty
and deprivation. The nature of the threat in science fiction movies
also shifts to reflect changes in fears or threats facing societies.
During the 1930s and 1940s, Americans expressed racial fears, as
manifested in the rise of the Klu Klux Klan, and in the film, King
Kong. |
During the 1990s, with the increased production of films and
the control of media conglomerates over the types of films being
made, an increasing number of formulaic genre films were produced.
Film studios needed to attract large audiences in order to make
a return profit on the millions they invested in high-production,
special-effects films, so they turned to safe, familiar genres and
sequels. As Wheeler Dixon (2000) argues: |
What audiences today desire more than ever before
is “more of the same,” and studios, scared to death
by rising production and distribution costs, are equally loathe
to strike out in new generic directions. Keep audiences satisfied,
strive to maintain narrative closure at all costs, and keep within
the bounds of heterotopic romance, no matter what genre one is ostensibly
working in. Yet, at the same time, the studios must present these
old fables in seductive new clothing, with high budgets, major stars,
lavish sets, and (if the genre demands it) unremitting action to
disguise the secondhand nature of the contemporary
genre film (p. 8).
|
| Film versus television genres. There are some important
differences between film and television genres. Film genres (see
list below) tend to be more general, for example, the western, action/adventure,
comedy, horror, science fiction, etc., while television genres (see
list below) are often specialized, for example, cooking shows, sports-talk
shows, children’s animation, etc. A film that is representative
of a certain film genre also tends to be self-enclosed — the
conflicts are often resolved within the film, even with film sequels.
In contrast, a television genre program tends to be part of a serial,
in which a storyline may continue and develop or characters may
evolve across different programs. |
List of film genres:
Yahoo
Directory: Movies and Film
Angelfire.com:
Film Genre Page
moviegoods.com
IMDb.com
filmsite.org:
The Greatest Films
|
List of television genres:
Yahoo
Directory: Television
dmoz.org
omni
seek
|
Resources/readings on film/television genres:
General
Critical Studies of Television
Amelie
Movie Guide
|
| For further reading on film/television genres:
|
Altman, R. (1999). Film/genre. London:
British Film Institute |
Browne, N. (Ed.) (1998). Refiguring American
film genres: History and theory. Berkeley, CA: University of
California Press. |
Creeber, G., Miller, T., & Tulloch, J. (Eds.).
(2001). The Television Genre Book. London: British Film
Institute. |
Dixon, W. (2000). Film genre 2000: New critical
essays. Albany: State University of New York Press, |
Elsaesser, T., & Buckland, W. (2002). Studying
contemporary American films: A guide to movie analysis. London:
Arnold. |
Fischer, L. (1996). Cinematernity: Film, motherhood,
genre. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. |
Grodal, T. (1997). Moving pictures: A new
theory of film genres, feelings, and cognition. New York: Oxford
University Press. |
Grant, B. K. (Ed.). (2003). Film genre reader
III. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. |
Mittell, J. (2004). Genre and television:
From cop shows to cartoons in American culture. New York: Routledge. |
Neale, S. (2000). Genre and Hollywood.
New York: Routledge. |
Neale, S. (Ed.). (2002). Genre and contemporary
Hollywood. London: British Film Institute. |
Strong, J., Dowd, G., & Stevenson, L. (2003).
Genre: Media, meaning and definitions. Bristol, UK: Intellect. |
|
|