|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Module
6 |
|
Application
of Semiotic Analysis to Ads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contemporary advertising depends primarily on assumed meanings
of images and signs. Semiotic analysis focuses on the meaning of
these images or signs in advertising based on a code system of consumption.
Robert Goldman (1992) notes that:
|
Modern advertising thus teaches us to consume, not
the product, but its sign. What the product stands for is more important
than what it is. A commodity-sign is complete when we take the sign
for what it signifies. For example, “diamonds may be marketed by
likening of them to eternal love, creating a symbolism where the
mineral means something not in its own terms, as a rock, but in
human terms, as a sign” (Williamson, 1978, 12). The diamond is on
longer a means of securing eternal love, it has become eternal love.
Conversely, eternal love assumes diamond-like qualities. (p. 19). |
Advertising therefore constructs the meaning of sign values associating
with constructing identities. Goldman cites the example of perfumes: |
Purchasing the right perfume means that a woman
will not only acquire a particular odor at a particular price but
“a gorgeous, sexy, young, fragrance.” A customer will, in consuming
the product, acquire the qualities of being gorgeous, sexy, and
young? No, she acquires a sign of being gorgeous, sexy, young. It
is the look we have come to desire; and the look we desire is the
object of desire. People thus become a kind of tabula rasa, a slate
filled with desired attributes by the objects they consumer; the
object becomes an active agent capable of going all the things that
a gorgeous, sexy and young person can do. (p. 24). |
Click here for a semiotic
analysis of magazine ads for men’s fragrances by Alexander Clare.
PBS:
Food Advertising Tricks
|
This suggests the need to analyze how brands acquire certain
meanings, how Cadillac or Christian Dior acquire meanings associated
with those brands through advertising and marketing. Describe the
meanings you associate with the following popular brand names and
how your acquired these meanings: |
Haagen-Dazs
Coke
Apple Computer
McDonald’s
Saturn
Rolex
Johnny Walker
FedEx
Campbell’s |
Greg Myers (1999) identifies four systems or “p’s” of marketing
that serve to constitute the meanings associated with these brands:
product, placement, promotion, and price. |
Product. The nature of the product, as
well as the packaging and presentation of the product — for example,
ads may describe the unique ways in which a beer is brewed. |
Placement. How products are placed and
displayed in a store in order to make certain brand names prominent
in a store. |
Promotion. How brands are promoted through
various advertising techniques. |
Price. How brands are promoted in terms
of being a “good value,” or, in terms of customers willingness to
pay a premium price. |
Myers also describes four more “p’s” associated with the promotion
of brands: past, position, practices, and paradigms. |
Past. Brand names are associated with a
certain tradition or “heritage” in terms of meanings based on how
advertisers create a record over time. |
Position. Advertisements attempt to place
brands in competitive relationships with other brands to mark those
brands as superior or unique — the fact that Hertz is #1 or Avis
“tries harder” (in the number two spot). |
Practices. Customers’ actual uses of products,
practices associated with the meaning of brands — the fact that
Starbucks coffee is associated with a yuppie practice of consuming
coffee and/or meeting with others at a coffee shop. As Myers notes,
practices may change — for example, how Levi’s jeans shifted from
being work clothes to more fashionable social markers. |
Paradigms. Larger cultural frameworks or
discourses shaping the meanings of brands, for example, how the
meaning of smoking in the 1950s compares with contemporary meanings
given shifts in larger paradigms related to perceptions of smoking.
|
Go back and review the meanings associated with the brand names
listed above in terms of Myers’s eight “p’s.” What advertising images
do you associate with your meanings of the different brands? What
intertextual experiences or code systems are you applying to construct
the meanings of these brands? |
The meanings of these brand names are constituted by larger public
relations campaigns involved in creating positive images for products,
companies, industries, or organizations. This includes creating
logos that are readily identifiable and that evoke a positive image.
If a logo is perceived to evoke an outdated, out-of-touch image,
that logo will then be revised. |
Click here for examples
of logos. |
Which of these logos are effective and which are not? |
Have students create
their own logos, using the following features: |
A good logo often has one or more of the following
attributes: |
-
Simplicity
-
Appealing colors
-
Legibility
-
A relevant graphic
|
The big question is, how does one judge whether
these attributes are present since each is very subjective? If you
have an opportunity, “test” your logo by allowing customers or potential
customers to see it. But the truth is, in the final analysis the
logo must please you. |
Look at the National Honey Board’s logo for an example: |

|
Take a look at the National Honey Board’s logo.
Judge it according to the attributes mentioned above: |
The logo is simple.
It has the word “Honey” and a bear eating from a honey jar. |
The logo is legible.
Even though “Honey” is in a script style, one can easily read it. |
The colors are appealing.
Though it’s not visible here, the logo is often shown in black and
white with a striking gold highlight. |
The logo features a relevant graphic.
The illustration of a bear eating honey implies the wide appeal
of honey, the product’s old-fashioned innocence, and its natural
purity. |
However, in some cases, there are problems with the argument
that brand names carry a lot of power. Wolfgang
Grassl argues that this concept of “brand idealism” fails to
consider the differences between brands and products, when they
are often quite different. For example, consumers of products such
as break or milk may not consider brand names in making such choices.
Or, in some cases, imitation products without the same brand name,
for example Rolex watches without the Rolex name, may retain their
same value. And, certain products cannot always be successfully
sold through marketing their brand name. |
In her book on branding, No
Logo, Naomi Klein (2000) argues that branding is part of
a larger multi-international corporate attempt to assume power and
control within the context of economic globalization. She is critical
of the emphasis on public relations campaigns designed to sell positive
images for companies who are either selling undesirable products
or who are violating worker rights or anti-pollution laws.
Education
Media Foundation video with Naomi Klein: No Logo: Brands, Globalization
& Resistance
|
Part of this branding process, marketing people attempt to determine
how adolescents construct their identities through wearing or using
products based on these products’ “coolness” or
brand names. Both the PBS Frontline documentary, Merchants of Cool
(entire
documentary online) and Alissa
Quart (2003) document the ways in which marketers hire consulting
firms and trend-spotters to acquire information about adolescents’
perceptions of what particular brands, fashions, music, and other
products are perceived of as trendy or “cool” (See also
Module 8 on media ethnography). They also encourage adolescents
to engage in word-of-mouth promotions of certain products with their
peers.
|
Use
of color in ads
|
For further reading on the semiotics of advertising: |
Forceville, C. (1998). Pictorial metaphor
in advertising. New York: Routledge. |
Williamson, J. (1994). Decoding advertisements:
Ideology and meaning in advertising. London: Marion Boyars. |