Rhetoric 1152: Writing on Issues in Science and Technology: Fall 2005


 
Instructor: Amy D. Propen
E-mail: prope002@umn.edu

Office: 69 ClaOff

Office Phone: 612.624.4933
Office Hours: M: 9:30am-10:30 am, or by appointment

Section 1:
MWF, 8:30am-9:20am, Magrath 8

Syllabus and course policies

Daily schedule (In progress and subject to change at instructor's discretion):



Course description

Required texts and materials

Required work

Attendance



Assignment deadlines

Students with disabilities

Format of assignments

Grading

 



Plagiarism

Student contract

Library Resources

Other Resources at UMN

 

 


Course description
In general, this course is designed to explore issues of scientific writing. We will explore the ethical, social, and political challenges that science and technology create. You will gain: 1) familiarity with current issues in science and technology; 2) practice in the strategies of critical analysis; 3) basic fluency in the conventions and philosophy of scientific discourse; and 4) an understanding of the role of science in society. For non-science majors, the goal is to gain competency in science as it pertains to socio-political contexts, which you will face as a citizen. For science majors, the goal is to increase your skill as a participant in these future debates.

More specifically, this course will emphasize critical thinking and writing about scientific issues. We will engage in discussion about issues of science and technology during which everyone will have the opportunity to express their ideas in an open and respectful forum. You will then be asked to practice writing formally and informally about these issues. Assignments will vary from low stakes free-writing to higher stakes article analyses, quizzes, and argument papers.
Back to top

 

Required texts and materials
  • Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in Science, Technology, and Society. Sixth Edition, 2005, Edited by Thomas Easton.
  • Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies, by Jared Diamond.
  • Additional readings available through the course website and class handouts.
  • A UMN e-mail account.
    Back to top

  •  

    Required work:

    Papers


    Four papers.
    Rhet 1152W is a "writing intensive" course. Accordingly, writing papers in response to the readings is central to the course. The type of papers assigned are arguments: thesis papers in which you defend your interpretation or position on an issue. Good argumentative papers present a cogent viewpoint, developing it coherently and cohesively. You must provide sufficient textual evidence in support of your position and address counter interpretations. I encourage you to use additional evidence from external sources, but you can find what you need within the texts we read.

    Specifically, Rhet 1152W requires you to write four papers. These are relatively short papers (4-5 pages, double-spaced, one inch margins all around). Class discussions will be invaluable toward exploring each issue completely and for finding an incisive focus for your paper. You will be required to develop these four short argument papers on issues chosen from four of the six units covered throughout the semester.

    Drafts and Re-writing.
    The purpose of the University's "writing intensive" requirement is to help you improve as a writer. Accordingly, you may re-write the first short paper you turn in after it is returned in order to improve your grade.

    Papers with an excess of one grammatical error or stylistic flaw per page may receive a substantially lower score, or may be returned ungraded. Help with writing can be obtained from the Online Writing Center or the Student Writing Center in Minneapolis. See links at the bottom of this page.

    More help.
    In addition to the student writing resources available through the University, we will discuss writing periodically throughout the semester, and you are encouraged to drop into my office to discuss your papers with me. I encourage you to work ahead and start on papers early to allow enough time for revisions. It is a very rare individual who can produce a coherent and cohesive argument in one draft.

    Five pop quizzes
    There will be six pop quizzes, and you may drop the lowest quiz grade of the six. These will be unannounced quizzes designed to reward everyone for reading for each class. There will be two questions (5 pts each) on each quiz for which you will either receive full credit or zero credit. No partial credit will be given. These quizzes may not be made up for any reason. You are allowed to drop your worst quiz and I have built in an additional 10 pts for a conference, which will more than compensate for any absences.

    Three scheduled quizzes
    Typically, these quizzes will include both short answer questions based on the content of the articles we read and a short essay based on the issues discussed. These quizzes are really mini-tests that will assess your knowledge of the course material and give you an opportunity to practice writing essays in class.

    Student-led discussions of Taking Sides issues
    Just about every week, usually on Wednesdays or Fridays, we will explore one of the issues from the Taking Sides text. During this time, groups of two or three students will be responsible for leading a class discussion and class activity on the issue. This is a fun and helpful way to engage with these issues and I encourage you to think about creative ideas for leading class discussion. We will also review the handout for How to Lead a Class Discussion, which I will distribute in class.

    Discussion/Participation
    Two other important factors that influence your grade are class attendance and participation in discussions. Class discussions will focus on the pages and/or articles from the reading assigned for the day, typically one of the issues from the text and/or additional articles TBA. Try to come to class with some ideas to bring up about the issue being discussed. If you do that, you are helping to make the class a fun and interesting learning environment, which will in turn help make the course a success.

    Back to top

    Attendance
    I will take attendance. Attendance is mandatory in this class. After three absences (even with a medical excuse), I may recommend that you withdraw from the class. If you are absent from class, it is your responsibility to find out from other students what you missed that day. If you are more than ten minutes late to class, I reserve the right to count your lateness as half of an unexcused absence. Two half-unexcused absences equal one whole unexcused absence.
    Note: Even though this is an early-morning class, you are still responsible for setting your alarm clock accordingly, leaving enough time for traffic, the campus connector, and so on.
    Back to top


    Assignment deadlines
    Papers: You must turn in or have all assignments ready at the start of class on the day they are due. Late assignments will be penalized by one-third of a letter grade for each class meeting that the assignment is late (that is, a B will become a B-). "The computer ate my file" or "The printer wouldn't print my paper" are no more legitimate excuses than "The dog ate my homework." Such excuses will not be accepted.

    If you are going to miss a class on a day when a paper is due, turn in the paper to me early or arrange to have a classmate turn in your work at the beginning of the class period it is due. In other words, make arrangements for your work to be in class even if you can't be. If you are sick, please make every effort to get the assignment in on time. If you cannot get your work in on time, bring a signed doctor's note to me; otherwise, the regular late assignment policy still applies. If you are absent from class, it is your responsibility to find out from other class members what you missed that day and what I have assigned for homework. You are responsible for the material covered in class, as well as any changes to the syllabus and daily schedule.

    Scheduled Quizzes: If you anticipate having to miss class on a day when a scheduled quiz is to be taken, you may ask to arrange to take the quiz at another time; this request must be made at least one class in advance. If you miss a quiz or exam because of illness or an emergency, you may retake the quiz or exam on the next class day provided that you have documentation proving that you were ill or that the emergency occurred. Otherwise, missed quizzes may not be made up. Important Note: Pop quizzes may not be made up for any reason.
    Back to top

    Students with disabilities
    If you are a student with a disability, you need to register with the Office of Disability Services right away, and bring me an official letter from the Office of Disability Services, with a detailed accommodation plan. You need to do this within the first week of class. This information will be kept confidential.
    Back to top


    Format of assignments
    All work must be typed or word-processed and printed with a readable printer. Papers should have one-inch margins on all sides, and text between 10- and 12- point type in a professional-looking font (no Courier or Courier New). For you own protection, keep copies of all work on floppy disks, hard disks, or flash drives, and on paper in case an assignment is lost. You must staple the pages together if the assignment is more than one page. Also, be sure your name and the page number appear on all pages that you hand in to me.
    Back to top

    Grading
    I rarely give incompletes. If, by the 10th or 11th week of the course, you feel that you may not be able to complete the course, please come see me. You may consider using a discretionary withdrawal. Written assignments will be graded on focus, organization, originality, completeness of discussion and of meeting assignment criteria, effective argument techniques and support, evidence of careful proofreading, correct grammar and effective sentence structure, among other criteria specific to each assignment. I will calculate your final grade as follows:

  • 4 Short Papers (4-5 pages) @125pts each: 50% (500pts)
  • Taking Sides Presentation: 10% (100pts)
  • 5 Pop Quizzes @ 10pts each: 5% (50pts)
  • 3 Scheduled Quizzes @ 50pts each: 15% (150 pts)
  • Attendance: 10% (100pts)
  • Participation: 10% (100pts)
  • 1 Conference: (+10pts) **Conferences will be held during one week of the semester during which regular class will not meet. You will receive 10 extra points for showing up to your conference. You may not make up this conference after the fact for any reason.

    Total: 100% (1000pts)

    I will also calculate your final grade based on the following University of Minnesota criteria:

    A 100-95 Represents achievement that is outstanding relative to the level necessary to meet course requirements.
    A- 94-90
    B+ 89-88
    B 87-85 Represents achievement that is significantly above the level necessary to meet course requirements
    B- 84-80
    C+ 79-78
    C 77-75 Represents achievement that meets the course requirements in every respect.
    C- 74-70
    D+ 69-68
    D 67-60 Represents achievement that is worthy of credit even though it fails to meet fully the course requirements.
    F 59- Represents failure and signifies that the work was either (1) completed but at a level of achievement that is not worthy of credit or (2) was not completed and there was no agreement between the instructor and the student that the student would be awarded an I

    Back to top

  • Plagiarism
    I encourage you to bounce ideas off each other, offer each other suggestions, and seek other opinions about your work. When you use the citable work of someone else, though, document your source. If you use someone else's words or ideas without acknowledging the source, if you do not properly quote someone else's words or images, or if you misleadingly submit work you have completed in another context, then you have committed plagiarism, a serious breach of academic and professional conduct.

    If you are caught plagiarizing, whether it be at the beginning, middle, or end of the semester, you will fail the course, and you will be reported to the Office for Student Academic Integrity. If you have questions about plagiarism as you complete your assignments, ask me. We will also cover this in class. See also: Center for Writing.
    Back to top

    Policy for electronic source use
    1. Students must provide printouts for any electronic sources they use.

    2. Students must use proper citation format (in-text and end list of references) for electronic sources, according to the citation system appropriate for their discipline.

    3. Students should be able to justify the validity of the sources they use, by one or more of the following methods:

  • Corroboration from other traditional print sources (journal articles, reports, etc.) of the ideas presented in the electronic source.
  • Ability to offer full information about where the source originated. Is it, for example, an on-line version of a print source? Is it a partially finished draft of someone's work in progress? Is it an e-mail? Is it an individual just looking for others who share his or her ideas? This justification should include a description of how the source's origin affects its validity.
  • Careful analysis of the reliability of the sources cited within the text.
  • Verification of the author's reputation or affiliation, or other publications by the author. If there is any doubt as to the reliability of particular electronic source, the student should confer with the teacher who will make the final decision about the source's acceptability.
    Back to top

  • Student contract
    Please print this contract, sign it, and return it to me at the next class meeting.
    Back to top

    Library Resources
    UMN Library System
    Julie Kelly: Librarian and Rhetoric Department Liaison
    Office Phone at 83 Magrath Library: 612.624.4781
    Magrath Reference Desk: 612.624.1212

    Other Resources at UMN
    Online Writing Center (OWC)
    Student Writing Center
    Office of Disability Services
    Office for Student Academic Integrity
    The Center for Writing
    Academic and Distributed Computing Services
    Rhetoric Department

    Back to top


    The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author.
    The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.