The Big Fees Squeeze Footnotes

1 "Commercial Bank Performance, First Quarter Report," Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and accompanying press release (PR-42-97), 17 June 1996; "Commercial Bank Performance, Second Quarter," FDIC, 11 September 1997. See Appendix A, pg. 22. (back)

2 Appendix A, pg. 22. (back)

3608 mergers of financial institutions occurred in 1995, and 554 took place in 1996. "Commercial Bank Performance, Second Quarter," FDIC, 11 September 1997. 198 banks were absorbed by mergers in the second quarter of 1997 alone. (back)

4 See section on service fees, below, at pg. 17. (back)

5"Big Banks, Bigger Fees: The 1997 PIRG Bank Fee Survey," by USPIRG, July 1997; "Banks Think Fees, Not Free: The 1995 PIRG Bank Fee Survey of 271 Banks in 26 States," by USPIRG and Janice Shields, August 1995; Crushing Consumers: The 1993 PIRG/CFA National Survey of 300 Banks in 23 States," by USPIRG, CFA and Janice Shields, PhD; "On a "Fee-"ding Frenzy; How Banks Profit from the Poor," by the Minnesota Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, (ACORN), February 1996; "Charging Ahead: ACORN's Fight for Fair Bank Fees," Minnesota ACORN, July 1997. (back)

6 National Credit Union Administration and Credit Union National Association v. First National Bank and Trust Company, et al, Cases 96-843 and 96-847, were the first cases on the U.S. Supreme Court's docket this term. The banks have brought suit against credit unions claiming credit unions are improperly expanding their fields of membership. (back)

7See discussion of bounced check fees below, at pg. 18. (back)

8 In 1992, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, a federal regulatory agency, preempted the application of a New Jersey Lifeline Checking Account Law to national banks, finding that the state was attempting to regulate in an area already controlled by the federal government. Consumer groups argue that the decision should be overturned, because the federal government has not mandated lifeline checking accounts, or issued any other requirement which would conflict with the New Jersey law. The decision was also strongly condemned by Congress. Conference Report, Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking Efficiency Act of 1994, H.R. 3841, Report # HR 103-651, 2 August 1994 at 53. (back)

9 12 U.S.C. §§ 4301-4313, and relevant federal regulations at 12 C FR Parts 230 and 707. (back)

10 The Truth in Savings Act also requires depository institutions to follow rules governing advertising; the provision of disclosures about the yield and terms of consumer deposit accounts; the circumstances in which the terms of such accounts may be changed; notices of maturity for certificates of deposit; and the contents of periodic statements. The Act also mandates notice requirements on certain types of interest bearing accounts and mandates specific disclosures that must be made on an institution's periodic statements, if statements are provided to the institution's customers. It also imposes standards for paying interest on accounts, including how institutions calculate the account balance on which interest is paid. (back)

11 15 USC § 1693-1693r; 12 CFR Part 205. (back)

12 MN Statutes 1996, Chapter 47.76. (back)

13 MN Statute 1996, Chapter 47.62. (back)

14 Liberty State Bank Fee Brochures, obtained by MPIRG researchers. (back)

15 Several researchers were told this by branch managers, and the author confirmed the large banks' policies by telephone. (back)

16 "Commercial Bank Performance, Second Quarter Report," FDIC September 1997. (back)

17 Web site of the National Credit Union Administration, (www. ncau.gov). (back)

18 American Banking Association's 1991 Retail Banking Survey Report. (back)

19 The conservative nature of these numbers is apparent when comparing the ABA's 1991 and 1994 Retail Banking Survey Reports. For example, the 1994 survey shows that the average regular checking account holder makes eighty-four ATM withdrawals a year, compared to the thirty reflected in the formula used by MPIRG, USPIRG, and CFA. (back)

20 This average was calculated originally by Janice Shields for bank fee reports by the Consumer Federation of America and USPIRG, using consumer trend statistics from the 1991 American Banking Association's Retail Banking Survey Report. (back)

21 Five additional branches of small banks, (four additional branches of First American, and one additional branch of Premiere Bank) were also surveyed. (back)

22 "Charging Ahead: ACORN's Fight for Fair Bank Fees," Minnesota ACORN, July 1997. (back)

23 "ATMS: Banks Report That Use of Surcharge Fee Has Increased," U.S. General Accounting Office, June 11, 1997. (back)

24 The March 1997 USPIRG ATM survey included sixteen machines in Minnesota, nineteen percent of which had a surcharge. US PIRG ATM Survey, March 1997. MPIRG surveyed 178 Minnesota machines not connected to bank branches, and in addition polled the surcharge policies of 80 financial institutions. The surcharge rate calculated by MPIRG, is over four times the USPIRG rate, probably due to the small sampling pool in the USPIRG study, and a steep rise in practice of surcharging in Minnesota and the rest of the nation. The USPIRG ATM surveys show a ninety-six percent increase in the numbers of ATMs that surcharged over a six month period, a trend that probably continued throughout 1997. (back)

25 U.S. Senate Hearing Record, Fair ATM Fees for Consumers Act, S. 1800, S. Hrg., 104-740, 11 July 1996, pg. 79. (back)

26"Money Making Machines," Pioneer Press, Oct. 19, 1997, pg. D1. (back)

27These rates are higher than those found in USPIRG's national survey in March 1997, which found that nationally forty-five percent of banks throughout the U.S. charged their customers for using a foreign ATM, at an average of $1.15. (back)

28 "Big Banks, Bigger Fees: The 1997 PIRG Bank Fee Report," USPIRG, July 1997, citing the industry trade paper Fee Income Report. (back)

29National 1996 Statistics for Insured Commercial Banks, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, available on the FDIC website, at www.fdic.gov. (back)

30 "Fuming Over Fees," Star Tribune, November 2, 1997. (back)

31Star Tribune, November 14, 1993, p.1D. (back)

32"Bounced Check Fees 7.5 Times Bank Costs," Center for the Study of Responsive Law, December 1994. (back)

33 Of the financial institutions surveyed, sixty-five percent had maximums for the amount of bounced check fees that could be charged in one day. The average maximum was $78.87 a day, but maximums ran as high as $180.00 a day. Some banks had no maximum at all, allowing banks to charge a customer several hundred dollars in penalties if multiple checks bounced on one day. (back)

34Catlin, Bill, "Banking on Fees, Part 1: Turning Rubber into Gold," Minnesota Public Radio, September 10, 1997. Catlin quotes Pat Hanson of Norwest, who confirms the so-called "hi/lo" policy exists at Norwest. (back)

35"Customers Accept Higher Fees when Banks Use a Little Finesse," American Banker, April 14, 1993, p.4. (back)

36MidAtlantic Journal of Business, v. 23, n.3, December 1993, p. 339 (7). (back)

37Overdraft charges at big banks surveyed average $21.82. (back)

38Overdraft charges at credit unions surveyed average $14.97. (back)

39Overdraft charges at small banks surveyed average $18.15. (back)

40"Big Banks, Bigger Fees: The 1997 PIRG Bank Fee Survey", July 1997, pg. 5. (back)

41See discussion of Truth in Savings Act above at page 5. (back)

42Minnesota HF 1278 and Minnesota SF 1493. (back)

43Mississippi Code Ann. § 81-5-100, 1996; Wyoming Stat. Ann. 13-1-502, 1997. (back)

44Alabama Code Ann. §5-5A-30, 1994; Cal.Ann. Code § 13080, 1997; Tenn. Code Ann. §45-16-103, 1996. (back)

45Bills related to ATM transactions which have been introduced in state legislatures in 1997 include: AZ HB 2212, CA AB 1104, CA AB 46, CT SB 989, FL HB 1961, GA HB 630, 8L HB 833, IL SR 13, IL SB 11, IL SB 12, IL HB 74, IN SB 13, LA HB 2386, LA SB 1370, LA HB 1513, LA HB 851, MD SB 481, MD HB 57, MA HB 1866, MI HB 4889, MI HB 4890, MI HB 4891, MI HB 4892, MI HB 4893, MN HF 2085, MN HF 1322, MN SF 1201, MO HB 701, MO HB 702, MO HB 79, MT HB 488, NY AB 8399, NY SB 5041, NY SB 4247, NY SB 4162, NY SB 4164, NY SB 4163, BY SB 4160, NY AB 6784, NY AB 5891, BY SB 2385, BY SB 1897, BY AB 1722, BY AB 591, BY AB 592, BY AB 406, NC BY 916, NC SB 808, OH SB 147, OH HB 347, OR HB 3626, OR SB 802, OR HB 3142, OR HB 3143, OR HB 3144, OR HB 3145, PA HB 1264, PA HB 640, PA HB 131, RI HB 6369, RI HB 5346, RI HB 5434, RI SB 70, TX HB 2967, TX HB 3124, TX SB 1261, TX HB 617, VT HB 24. (back)

46U.S. Senate Bill 885. See also U.S. House Bill 264, introduced by Rep. Roukema. (back)

47Minnesota SF 1201 and Minnesota HF 1322; Minnesota SF 1983, Minnesota HF 2085. (back)

48Refer to the discussion of the federal Truth in Savings Act, above at page 5. (back)
49While Firstar branches charge $25 for overdrafts, they only charge $22 for a check returned for non-sufficient funds (NSF). (back)
50Eastern Heights Savings Bank charges $20 for overdrafts, and $17 for NSF fees. (back)
Return Go back to main MPIRG page
All comments and suggestions are welcome.
Send mail to: mpirg@gold.tc.umn.edu


The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author.
The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.