Fall 2002

Criteria for Book/Paper Review

  • Key ideas in the book are briefly summarized.

  • General position of the author with respect to instructional technology is identified. Can the person be identified as being part of any identifiable group?

  • Key ideas are contrasted and compared with other persons writing about a similar topic, particularly from the CI5331 class readings.

  • Evaluative judgments are presented so that different perspectives to be clearly identified.

  • Explanation is presented about how the information from the book is (or will be) beneficial to present or future occupations one has or plans on doing.

  • Summary comments are made about the general contribution of the book to advancing your and others' understanding about the potential for instructional technology.

Jump to other sections of this course:

Course Schedule

Syllabus Week 1

Sept 4

 Week 2

Sept 11

 Week 3

Sept 18

 Week 4

Sept 25
Week 5

Oct 2

 Week 6

Oct 9

 Week 7

Oct 16

 Week 8

Oct 23

 Week 9

Oct 30
Week 10

Nov 6

 Week 11

Nov 13

 Week 12

Nov 20

 Week 13

Dec 4

 Week 14

Dec 11
Copyright 2002 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. This information is subject to change without notice. This page was last modified on August 20, 2002. For questions or comments, contact Dr. Judith J. Lambrecht, course instructor.

 


The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author.
The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.