Richard.Jewell.net

CollegeWriting.info

Home Page

      

Activities & Exercises for Xxx Writing   

Chapter
Home

            

Activities for This Chapter (or scroll down)  

GO TO "Activities & Groups" (or go to the following individual activities)

 

Activities
for Groups

Running a
Small Group

 

Activities
for Individuals
Computer Lab,
Telephone, & Online Groups

 

Topical Activities

Activities for 25
Different Types of Papers

 

7 Metacognitive
Thinking Activities
 
   
   

     

       
          

  

   Activities for This Chapter   
  1. XXXXX
        

  2. "FUN" PAGE: Go to the chapter's "Fun" page and, as an individual or a group, engage in one of its activities.
       

  3. THOUGHTS ABOUT THE CHAPTER: Read the chapter and take notes about it using one of the three methods in "General Study Questions."
          

  4. OTHER ACTIVITIES: For a wide variety of other activities and exercises, go to "Activities & Groups."
          

  5. ROUGH DRAFT: As an individual or a group, write a XXXXXX as described in this chapter's "Introduction" or "Basics."  Use the subtitles shown in "Introduction" or "Basics" as subtitles of your rough draft, and write at least 50+ words in each body section.  If you are working as a group, you may, if your instructor allows, develop a fictional and fanciful background and subject for your rough draft.
        

  6. GROUP CRITIQUE OF A LATER DRAFT: If your class has a paper all of you are preparing for grading, gather in a group to critique each other's developed drafts:  
         
                (a) Simply pass the papers to each other; your paper preferably should be checked by three other people.   (Some instructors prefer that you make several copies, distribute them to your group members, take the copies home that you receive, and comment on them there.) 
         
                (b) Write comments for each other.  To do so, use a a set of grading guidelines (or "rubric"): for example, "How are the contents," "How is the organization of parts," "Do paragraphs work well," and "How well have editing errors been corrected?"  Preferably, you can use the guidelines your instructor applies when grading.  
         
                (c) For each question or requirement in your guidelines, write one or more comments.  Your comments should be substantial and specific (more like a complete sentence, and more specific than just "Nice!" or "Needs work").  Your comments also should be positive or helpfully constructive: when positive, they should offer specific praise of a particular part, detail, or method; when constructive, they should offer specific advice about what to add or do to make the paper better.  
         
                (d) Add a final positive or constructive comment about how you think the average reader of this paper might respond to it, and/or how the paper could be changed or fixed for a stronger or more positive response from its audience.  

       
             (e) After receiving your comments from others, take them home.  Review what they have written.  Remember that your readers are not commenting on you as a person, but rather on how easily (or poorly) they have been able to read your paper as its audience members.  Pay attention in particular to comments that may have been repeated by more than one of your readers.

Return to beginning.

   

----------

     

Most recent update: 8-14-04
                

CollegeWriting.Info is at http://www.CollegeWriting.info.    

First publication: 1 Jan. 2004 (unless stated otherwise above).

Contents and Page Design © 2002-2004 by Richard JewellNonprofit copying for education is allowed.

Images courtesy of Barry's Clip Art, Clip Art Warehouse, The Clip Art Universe, Clipart Collection, Microsoft Clip Art Gallery and Design Gallery Live, School Discovery, and Web Clip Art.
Click here to contact the author: Richard Jewell.  I welcome questions, suggestions, and notes about links.

- End -

    

    

    

     

     

     

     

      

      

      

      

      

      

       

           

           

         

   


The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author.
The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.