Curious, my polling place moved from an apartment just a block away to De La Salle High School on Nicollet Island. Perhaps my precinct is larger than I thought? Hmm. I'm in school district 001. Nifty ;-)
So, let's see. Here are my contested races:
| Constitution | Michael Peroutka and Chuck Baldwin |
| Green | David Cobb and Pat LaMarche |
| Libertarian | Michael Badnarik and Richard Campagna |
| Republican (I) | George W. Bush and Dick Cheney |
| Democratic-Farmer-Labor | John F. Kerry and John Edwards |
| Socialist Equality | Bill Van Auken and Jim Lawrence |
| Socialist Workers | Roger Calero and Arrin Hawkins |
| Christian Freedom | Thomas J. Harens and Jennifer A. Ryan |
| Better Life | Ralph Nader and Peter Miguel Camejo |
Yeah, I've considered Kerry and Edwards, but a number of things still bug me about that. For one thing, in the debates they've been quick to practically scream, “We'll kill the terrorists too!,” but I have issues with that. Call me old-fashioned, but I kind of like the Constitution and the rule of law. I guess I'm just a liberal softie.
I took a look at Cobb a while back, but I wasn't all that impressed. I suppose I didn't give much more than a glance though—this was months before the election, remember? I pondered the Libertarian candidate a little bit four years ago, but I guess I just think that capital-L Libertarians are almost like anarchists, only with money.
Christian Freedom? I still kinda like that whole church-state separation thing. I mean, I know we don't have to worry about King George anymore, just this other one.
| Green | Jay Pond |
| Republican | Daniel Mathias |
| Democratic-Farmer-Labor (I) | Martin Olav Sabo |
I'll have to look into the House race a little bit more. Considering that Sabo has been in office almost as long as I've been alive, it would probably be good to get some fresh blood in there. I'll take a look at Jay Pond and see if he has anything interesting to say. His issues page kind of seems like the Greens' party line (not that there's necessarily anything wrong with that, but I still haven't figured out what single-payer health insurance is).
| Green | Becki Smith |
| Independence | Ron Lischeid |
| Republican | Amanda Hutchings |
| Democratic-Farmer-Labor (I) | Phyllis Kahn |
And, well, Phyllis Kahn has been the state representative here since about the time my parents graduated from college. 32 years is quite a while. However, I don't know if anyone else has a whole lot to add. Hmm. It looks like Becki Smith lives on my block. I may have to go knock on her door (or push the buzzer button thingy ;-)
| Gregory J. Bownik |
| Jonathan M. Burris |
| Kevin W. Rodewald |
| Michael Wyatt |
| Alan C. Page (I) |
| Tim Tingelstad |
Yes, that Alan Page is the Alan Page of the Minnesota Vikings. I don't know much about him other than that. However, Tim Tingelstad worries me. This post in the Twin Cities LiveJournal community points out that he's pretty much running on the idea of pushing his religious values.
Our founding fathers were inspired by God to create the greatest form of government the world has ever known. These were men of strong convictions and a deep faith in God. They were certain that this Nation would only prosper if we continue to embrace the Biblical principles upon which they built our constitutional government. It is time to rediscover our Godly heritage; to restore His Truth to our communities, our State and our Nation.Discarding the basic misunderstanding there (many of the Founding Fathers were Christian, though a significant number were Deists), I don't want to see a Roy Moore here, so I'll definitely be going for Page.
| David Minge (I) |
| Paul Elliot Ross |
Pretty much ditto here. Ross is another right-winger.
| Daniel L. Griffith |
| R. A. (Jim) Randall (I) |
And here, Griffith is concerned with getting “of all people, Christians” into elected office.
| Julie Delgado O'Neil |
| Thor Anderson |
| Stephen Allan Baker |
| Susan N. Burke |
| Kevin J. Kolosky |
| LaJune Thomas Lange |
Everything else on my ballot is uncontested…
Posted by mike at October 13, 2004 10:35 AM | Decision 2004 | TrackBack4th district court
I don't usually vote for judges cuz I generally don't do the research. I looked up candidates for the primary and was trying to decide between two candidates. My son came home and I invited him to walk with me to the polling place. He told me that the "League of Pissed Off Voters" had endorsed the two I was looking at. Susan Burke was one of them.
I thank you for your thoughtful comments and I have one request. PLEASE don't vote for Nader in this election. Even if Nader can't see it, we need every vote to insure Bush does not continue his destruction of Nader's legacy. We need every vote we can get for Kerry, as the only chance to get Bush as far away from the big red button as possible. Thank you.
Posted by: Glenn Livezey at October 19, 2004 06:27 PMHey, I agree with Glenn! I'm a waaaay progressive person politically, was out there protesting the war (and the one before), believe Nader has done wonderful things for this country - but if Kerry doesn't win Minnesota (and despite what the polls say, he just might not), we're going to definitely see four more years of sending this country down the drain. There IS a big difference between Bush and Kerry - Please don't vote Nader!
Oh, and nice to hear more about the League of PIssed Off Voters - sounds like a useful group.
Vote for who you think is the best candidate. I think that people who have nothing more to contribute to a discussion about Nader than "you're spoiling the election for Kerry" should all stop talking about politics. They are making America dumber, and that is hard.
Posted by: Pete at November 1, 2004 08:13 PMMike - thanks for doing some of the research on the local ballot. It cleared up a few questions for me.
On the topic of Nader, as much as I'd like to vote with my heart, I believe that as voters we must be pragmatic. I found the following comment from a slashdot.org poll quite apt.
--
Voting is not some sort of poll of your innermost beliefs. It's a choice with foreseeable consequences. Voting third party is like flipping a light switch that isn't wired, and proclaiming "But I want this switch to be wired." That's nice. But the fact is, it's not. Flipping it does not achieve your goal.
Or, look at this way. If it's raining and there's a hole in your asphalt roof, you can choose to let it drip on you while saying "My true preference is for a tile roof, and I'm not going to compromise." Or you can go patch it with an asphalt shingle, even if you don't honestly like them much. Getting the drip to stop is not about your personal tastes in roofing.
If you want to vote 3rd party, you first have to change the voting mechanism so that voting 3rd party actually helps achieve your goals.
--
There is one really good reason for voting Kerry. He looks at the facts and makes informed decisions based on those facts. He can recognize a bad law and vote against it rather than just reading the name of the bill and making up his mind.
I do not want to see four more years of Bush. Count me in as one of those in the reality based community.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/17BUSH.html
WARNING regarding Gregory J. Bownik, He's a radical Zionist as evident in his article titled, "Shimon Peres is no Richard Nixon." We don't need any more extremist or neo-cons in public office
Posted by: candidate watch at November 2, 2004 07:27 AMHi, great stuff here.
Thanks for the heads-up on Bownik. Any info on the guys he's running against for District 5? Seems hard to find info on them.
Thanks,
CAH