Internet Legal Research for Poverty Law & Public Interest Attorneys
By G.R. Jackson, Reference Librarian
University of Minnesota
Law Library


Contents

Introduction:  

Limitations of the Internet & What You Can Expect to Find 

The Internet is still not yet ready to meet all of your legal research needs despite the many it can. Reviewing Law on the Net by James Evans, Michael Levy, a Boalt law librarian, says, "[T]he Internet is not ready for traditional legal research as many resources are not in the public domain, there is limited access to secondary sources, and specialized legal tools such as verification and updating services are not available. ...[A] user often lacks the traditional signifiers to designate validity, authenticity, and reliability of the information they are receiving. This is valid for all Internet resources but absolutely crucial for law-related information."

Another deficit apparent when comparing the Internet to electronic databases provided by commercial vendors and traditional print law libraries is that the Internet rarely (with some exceptions) provides much in the way of retrospective coverage, although this is beginning to change in some areas. A phenomenon of the 1990's, the Internet hosts many sites and databases, the majority of which lack the resources to promote such retrospective expansion for research and archival purposes. Therefore, much Internet information goes back not much earlier than the mid-90s. Nonetheless, the rapid expansion and increasing sophistication of the World Wide Web is providing the first realistic threat to the supremacy of Westlaw and Lexis. For the time being, however, Lexis and Westlaw remain the only arguable one-stop-shopping destinations for the electronic legal researcher.  However, let's not forget about VersusLaw and LoisLaw.

The Internet is nonetheless emerging as formidable competition for the commercial vendors of electronic legal information. Without listing and weighing advantages and disadvantages, suffice it to say that it behooves the legal researcher to develop familiarity with, and expertise in, Internet legal resources and research. Coverage of primary materials on the 'net is expanding rapidly, even retrospectively somewhat.  Increasingly, government is turning to electronic publication on the web, so many more official sources are available than was the case just a few years ago.  In addition, many non-profits, other associations, and educational institutions are publishing materials useful to the attorney in practice.

Evaluating Information for Quality and Authenticity

Distinguishing between primary and secondary materials, be aware of the source of primary materials you find on the web. For instance, many primary, federal materials are among the GPO and GPO ACCESS databases. Many of these same databases are considered official sources by the government, and are also considered part of the Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP). URLs ending in .gov are most often very reliable. In other instances, similar databases are available via the websites of various universities and other types of institutions with educational missions. If I can be certain that I've reached a reliable .edu site (like the Legal Information Institute of Cornell), my confidence about the reliability of that information rises.  And now, the same can be said about many .orgs, .coms, and so forth.  If you find the site of a reputable entity, you have the assurance they stand behind their information, much as traditional publishers of print information products do.

Secondary materials are also found at many .gov and .edu websites, as well as many other types of sites (.org, .com, .net, .mil, etc.). First, ascertain that a website is what it says it is. Then, ascertain the reputation and purpose of the host of the website. Even if these things cannot be easily ascertained, the information discovered on a website might prove so useful, that it would be worthwhile to use an external source to confirm its veracity, authority, and integrity.

http://www.virtualchase.com/quality
Tyburski, Genie (ed.), Evaluating the Quality of Information on the Internet available at http://www.virtualchase.com/quality/index.html (last revised September 28, 2007).

Learn to detect the information quality of a web site. Superior resources offer objectivity, timeliness, accuracy, and authority. More importantly, readers can verify information provided by trustworthy sources. This article in The Virtual Chase offers a checklist for discovering quality in Web-based information.  It discusses the attributes of quality in information, tells how to identify quality, and provides numerous examples of questionable Web-based information.

http://www.llrx.com/columns/quality.htm
Tyburski, Genie, Publishers Wanted, No Experience Necessary: Information Quality on the Web (June 24, 1997).

In this older but still useful article, Ms. Tyburski re-emphasizes the importance of considering the source of information before relying on information obtained from it. Superior web sites possess five characteristics: timeliness, expediency, accuracy, objectivity, and authenticity. To review, timeliness and expediency refer to the speed with which a source makes up-to-date information available. Accuracy pertains to the completeness, factual irrefutability, and verifiability of a source. Objectivity encompasses impartial unbiased interpretation or analysis. Authenticity deals with the authority and expertise of a source; it may include appearance.

Ascertain a site's objectivity by reading its purpose statement. This should be available on a reputable site's homepage, or via a hyperlink from the home page.  Next, discover how the site obtains and updates the information it provides. Good sites are likely to offer easy-to-find documentation. Third, some sites offer commentary on the law. If so, ascertain the credentials or reputation of the individual, organization, or company giving the review. Researchers should also look for an article's creation and revision dates. This information lends credence to a source. Finally, researchers should confirm that which they find. Verifying information substantiates its completeness or accuracy.

While hard copy sources may ultimately be the best for verification of information found on the Internet, Westlaw and Lexis are excellent substitutes for lawyers with access.

A couple of final criteria are simple to ascertain by asking yourself basic questions.  Does the site indicate when it was last updated?  Is it easy to find the privacy policy?  Is there a source to whom questions can be addressed? 

http://www.llrx.com/features/webeval.htm
Humphries, LaJean, How to Evaluate a Web Site (December 2, 2002).

Offers criteria for evaluation as well as links to many sites useful in evaluating the quality and reliability of a web site's information.

http://www.vuw.ac.nz/staff/alastair_smith/evaln/evaln.htm
Smith, Alastair, Evaluation of Information Sources (last modified October 19, 2006).

This document is a part of the Information Quality WWW Virtual Library -- The Internet Guide to Construction of Quality Online Resources. It contains links to criteria for evaluating information resources, particularly those on the Internet.

Search Engines & Searching 

"The Search"

The Internet search is really much the same as searching in many other types of research.  The difference is in the vast amount of information retrieved, and hence the need to evaluate the information retrieved as mentioned just above.  Aside from browser features and other bells and whistles which enhance the world wide web, and before fingers ever meet keyboard, the most important step is the intellectual one.  Think about what you're seeking and then formulate a search vocabulary and a query or two.  This is what is necessary whenever we walk into a library or when we log onto Westlaw or Lexis.  Only the medium is different, and it's very different at that.

The Internet is mostly an uncontrolled environment.  Standards and uniformity are lacking, and unlike commercial legal research services, there is no single authoritative directory.  That is not to discount the importance of portals like Findlaw, Yahoo, and ProjusticeMN.  However, things change rapidly. This is why the search is important, and luckily, there is usually a varierty of ways to search.

Searching for the Very Specific

If you have any unique references to what you're seeking, this will always make things easier, especially now that search engines are so good.  Try the unique reference (or two) first.  Some examples of unique or specific references are docket numbers, citations, titles, and names.

Thinking Bibliographically & Looking for Authority

Much of legal research is about seeking authority.  If searching for the specific was unyielding, and providing you know the appropriate authority, this actually makes searching somewhat easier than in many other cases.  If you're looking for primary material, and often even if you're seeking secondary material, think about who publishes it or who is the authority for the types of documents you seek.  This is much like using a library's catalog and thinking bibliographically.

Imagine you're looking at records from a library's card, or electronic, catalog.  The most important information is almost always going to be the author and/or the title; although publication place and date, as well as publisher name, can also be useful.  If the title doesn't retrieve the desired information, then the next step should be figuring out who is responsible for that information.  An individual?  Some other kind of entity?  If you can find a site for that entity, you could be that much closer to paydirt.  Having found such a site, ascertain whether it has a search function or a site map.  Even without these internal access points, you could use that URL in Google', or MSN Search's, advanced search page to search within that site only.  If you've searched the catalogs of a law library or two, note the subject headings for some of the titles you find in that library.  These are likely useful search terms when applied to a good search engine like Google or MSN Search.

Learn from Bad Searches

It may be that several searches are necessary before you have the right information.  Often an inaccurate query will reveal enough information for a better search to be performed subsequently.  You will often learn enough from missteps to understand more appropriately what you want.  This isn't that different from revising a Lexis or Westlaw query until you've "got it right."

Google

Check out the advanced search features.  These can make a huge difference in searching effectively.  In addition to being able to search various combinations of words and phrases, you can exclude words to further tighten a search.  Maybe one of the best limitations you can apply is the ability to search within particular domains, .e.g. .edu for education sites, .gov for government sites, .mil for military sites, .org for organizational (& often non-profits' sites), and so forth.  In fact, you're even allowed to search within particular, individual websites.  These are examples of increasingly powerful tools becoming available to Internet searchers. Other search engines like MSN Search offer similar power and utility.  Click on their advanced search features and explore for 5 minutes, followed by a quick look at any preferences which can be set.  Seemingly little things like these can significantly enhance effectiveness in searching.

Primary Federal Materials / Official Sites
Primary Federal Materials / Selected Non-Official Sites
Minnesota Primary Materials / Officially Hosted Sites
Organizations, Associations, & Non-Profits  (separately linked page)

The associations and organizations on this page which relate to poverty law were retrieved from the Encyclopedia of Associations.  The list has not been updated recently.  Simple searches using the headings for the topical subdivisions of the list were used as search terms.  They were combined with the term <law> in most instances.  Follow this procedure to update the list.


Law Portals, Mega-, and Metasites

As there is no single authority responsible for all of the information on the Internet, different entities and enterprises have attempted to bring some organization to various categories of information or knowledge.  This means that if searching for the specific wasn't fruitful and if the supposed authority didn't lead to a relevant site, there's yet another method by which to search the web.  This is usually similar to browsing a directory or a table of contents.  The information is arranged categorically, hierarchically, and hopefully somewhat logically.  Legal information is mostly arranged by authority and jurisdiction and lends itself well to these systems of organization.  For example, check out the the jurisdiction tables in the blue pages in the back of the Blue Book.

These are usually hybrid services with characteristics of hierarchical directories as well as some search functions. They have traditionally been good for the layperson, but such ease of use and functionality also bodes well for more professional legal researchers. These sites seem likely candidates for filling in some of the gaps in secondary sources on the web.

These sites have many things in common. They are good centralized locations for legal and government information. They generally provide subject access to legal information with many, many links to professional associations, directories, law schools, practice materials, primary materials, legal publishers, research information,      sometimes search engines & other search capabilities, and even more.

Legal Information Institute at Cornell (LII) (click here)

Hieros Gamos (click here)

FindLaw (click here)

WashLaw Web (click here)

Yahoo's Law Guide (click here)

ABA's LAWlink (click here)

Law Libraries, Legal Collections, and Law Librarians

Don't forget traditional law libraries.  Searching their catalogs is probably a familiar exercise for most of us.  Records for titles retrieved may include URLs for electronic equivalents of that source, which may or may not be free and/or in the public domain.  The retrieved records also yield useful search terms which can then be employed using the search engines mentioned above.  Titles, authors' names, and Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) all can be useful search terminology.

Many, if not most, law libraries have websites.  They often contain research guides and pathfinders.  These resources provide specific instructions for researching in particular subjects and areas, but they also are likely to indicate what the important sources are in those subjects and areas.  Use a search engine's advanced search features to limit your search to the .edu domain.  Use terminology like "research" and/or "guide", maybe "law" and/or "legal", and finally a relevant topical term such as "Indian" and/or "child/children" and maybe "custody".  You get the idea.

Finally, don't forget the librarians, especially reference libarians.  Those of us dedicated to reference spend our lives doing, and thinking about, all of this stuff.  We usually know the "how to" of researching as well as specific results from having done so.  Helping alumni and others (depending on the type of law library) is part of our mission.  When we have the experience you need, we are glad to share.  And even when we don't, we can often employ our bibliographic wiles to your advantage.
FindLaw's links to law libraries. (click here)

Yahoo's links to law libraries. (click here)

Twin Cities Law Libraries:

University of Minnesota Law Library. (click here)
  • E-mail a University of Minnesota Reference Librarian at law-ref@umn.edu (click here for form)
  • UMLL links to poverty law sources (click here)William Mitchell College of Law Library. (click here)

Hamline University Law Library. (click here)

Hennepin County Law Library. (click here)

Minnesota State Law Library. (click here)

Minnesota Legislative Reference Library. (click here)

Directory of Minnesota County Law Libraries. (click here)

Minnesota Association of Law Libraries (MALL). (click here)

American Association of Law Libraries (AALL). (click here)

Special Libraries Association (SLA)  Legal Division. (click here)

Legal Research Sites
Use these sites when you have a research question and cannot reach a reference librarian:
Topical Resources, Including Administrative Agency Materials
Blawgs & RSS feeds

Blawgs (law blogs) are possible sources of valuable information on new, emerging, and evolving legal issues.  Depending on the authority and prestige of the blogger, the value can be great or not so great.  As legal experts and law professors have begun blogging, they have found a way to discuss, analyze, and comment on extremely new or rapidly developing legal issues.  The medium is perfect for practically instantaneous responses to new court opinions or other very recent legal news events.  If you can find a blawg by a respected legal authority on your topic, it may be the first place to find relevant legal analysis and commentary on the issues in which you're interested.  A selective list of law blogs follows:

the 13th Juror
Academic Blogs / Law
Blackprof.com
Blawg Directory
Chinese Law Prof Blog
Feminist Law Professors
ImmigrationProf Blog
International Environmental Law Blog
Jurist Legal News and Research
Land Use Prof Blog
Law Libraries & Research
Law Library Blogs
Law of the Land
Law.com Blog Categories
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Subject Areas
Poverty Law Prof Blog
Products Liability Prof Blog
PropertyProf Blog
Public Defense Blogs
Reproductive Rights Prof Blog
Search & Seizure Blog
Securities Law Prof Blog
Sentencing Law & Policy
State and Local Government Law Prof Blog
State Jurisdictions, Blogs by
Statutory Construction Blog
Wills, Trusts & Estates Prof Blog

RSS (Really Simple Syndication) makes it possible for people to keep up with their favorite web sites in an automated manner that's easier than checking them manually.  Similar to alerts on Lexis and/or Westlaw, once you set up an RSS feed for a site, you will be able to receive updates as soon as new content is added to the site.

Bloglines is an example of a free online service that helps you subscribe to and manage web information, such as news feeds, weblogs and audio. Bloglines tracks the information you're interested in, retrieves new stuff as it happens, and organizes everything for you on your own personal web news page.  You search for the content you are interested in and identify the feeds you want to track. Once you "subscribe" to those feeds, Bloglines will constantly check those feeds for changes or additions and direct new information onto your Bloglines personal page.    


The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author.
The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.