General Grading Guidelines:



Literacy

A (5) Fluent expression; ideas succinctly stated; proper mechanics (spelling, grammar, punctuation).

B (4) Clear communication; writing coherent despite several mechanical mistakes.

C (3) Adequate communication but writing is choppy due to stylistic or grammatical problems.

D (2) Minimal communication; major stylistic or grammar problems.

F (1) Communication of ideas extremely limited due to major stylistic and grammar problems.



Logic and Rhetoric

A (5) All ideas are rationally developed, supported, and sequenced. Exceptionally persuasive.

B (4) Most ideas are rationally developed, supported, and sequenced. Above average in persuasiveness.

C (3) Development of ideas is acceptable but generally weak. Average in persuasiveness.

D (2) Many ideas are unsupported.

F (1) Little cohesiveness or development of ideas.



Content, Completeness, and Presentation

A (5) The paper has responded powerfully and directly to the assignment. Its main idea is stated freshly, the style is fluent, the content is thought-provoking, imaginative, clear, and engaging, and the writing meets the needs of the audience exceptionally well. Exceptional.

B (4) The paper fulfills the assignment in more than a routine way. The writing is clear and direct and the style shows some helpful and interesting variety. Above average.

C (3) The paper is adequate and fundamentally competent. Average.

D (2) The paper responds to the assignment in an inadequate way. The content is highly derivative from others or shows a misunderstanding of the assignment or the subject and fails to meet the needs of the audience.

F (1) The paper meets almost none of the expectations of the audience. The paper may also not respond directly or fully to the assignment.



Organization and Clarity

A (5) The paper is exceptionally and carefully well organized and the main idea is clear and well supported.

B (4) The paper is organized to support the main idea in an above average way. The organization supports the paper's meaning, tone, and effect in an above average way.

C (3) The organization of the paper is adequate. The organization has a few weaknesses but does not fall apart. Average.

D (2) The paper is structurally faulty but a main point is apparent or a line of reasoning is traceable.

F (1) The paper is so poorly organized that it is often difficult for the reader to find the main idea or to trace the main line of reasoning.




The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author.
The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.