top of pagetop of page
Alan G Gross, Professor of Communication Studies

 

Home Page

Academic Background

Scholarship

Books

Rhetorical Theory and Criticism

Science and Technology

Medical Science

Philosophy of Science

Sociology of Science

Essay Reviews

Visual Communication

 

 

Published Articles Concerning Science and Technology

"The Verbal and the Visual in Science: A Heideggerian Perspective."  Science in Contest, 19
                (2006):  443-474
“What’s Right About Scientific Writing.” (with Joseph Harmon).
                The Scientist, 13 (December,9, 1999): 20.
“Learned Ignorance.” Two Be: A Journal of Ideas, 13 (1998): 94-96.
“The Challenger Disaster and the Revival of Rhetoric in Organizational Life.”
                 (with Arthur Walzer) Argumentation, 11 (1997): 75-93.
                  Access PDF File (requires Acrobat Reader)
“The Scientific Style Manual: A Reliable Guide to Practice?”
                (with Joseph Harmon)  Technical Communication, 43 (1996): 61-72
“Renewing Aristotelian Theory: Cold Fusion as a Test Case.”
                Quarterly Journal of Speech, 81(1995): 48-62.
“Positivists, Postmodernists, and Aristotelians and the Challenger Disaster.”
                College English, 56 (1994): 420-33.  With Arthur Walzer. 
                Access PDF File (Requires Acrobat Reader)
“Ending it All: Closure in Science and Its Philosophy.”
                Argumentation, 8 (1994): 9-20.
“Does the Rhetoric of Science Matter?  The Case of the Floppy Eared Rabbits.”
                College English, 53 (1991): 933-943. 
                 Access PDF File (requires Acrobat Reader)
“Extending the Expressive Power of Language: Tables, Graphs, and Diagrams.”
                Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 20 (1989-90): 221-235.
“A Primer on Tables and Figures.” Journal of Technical Writing and
                Communication, 13 (1983): 33-55.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author.
The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.