PROTECTING PATIENTS FROM
GREEDY RELATIVES


FINANCIAL MOTIVES FOR CHOOSING AN EARLIER DEATH

    The right-to-die might sometimes become the duty-to-die
when the dying patient has a significant estate
that will pass to the named heirs at death.
Usually these heirs are family members.
And usually they know in advance what they will receive
in terms of wills, trusts, life-insurance,
and/or the normal operation of inheritance law.

    In some cases, the medical care of the patient
is being paid for (at least in part) from the assets of the patient,
the remainder of which will pass to the relatives upon death.
Putting this another way, the potential estate
is being used for the terminal care for the patient.
The relatives worry that these assets will be wasted in useless terminal care.
They have in mind better uses for the cash, farm, business, stocks, & bonds.
If the patient is married, the financial cost to the other spouse
is even more obvious and direct:
Sometimes medical bills are being paid for from their joint assets.

    Pure greed is seldom the sole motive for wanting an earlier death.
But every person who stands to benefit financially from the death of another
has thought at least briefly about that fact.
When the beneficiary is a family member,
that heir might have dismissed the monetary motive as soon as it appeared.
But the amount to be inherited did appear in the thought of the relative,
even if the primary feeling of the relatives is love and compassion
for the person who is dying.
Few heirs are completely unaware
of what they stand to gain by the death of the relative.
Only rarely does a 'rich uncle' leave some money
that the heir did not know was coming.

    Thus financial gain is at least one part of the mixture of motives
that happen in the process of deciding the best time for the patient to die.



PROTECTING AGAINST GREEDY RELATIVES

    Careful safeguards can help to prevent premature deaths motivated by money.
The safeguards that would counter-balance the financial incentives
call for the considered judgment of neutral persons who will not benefit financially.

    Here are nine safeguards that will be most effective against greed,
listed in order of effectiveness, beginning with the most powerful:

REPORT TO THE PROSECUTOR BEFORE THE DEATH TAKES PLACE

CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR CAUSING PREMATURE DEATH

A MEMBER OF THE CLERGY APPROVES OR QUESTIONS THE CHOICE FOR DEATH

REQUESTS FOR DEATH FROM THE PATIENT

INFORMED CONSENT FROM THE PATIENT

UNBEARABLE SUFFERING

PHYSICIAN'S STATEMENT OF CONDITION AND PROGNOSIS

ETHICS COMMITTEE REVIEWS THE LIFE-ENDING DECISION

STATEMENTS FROM ADVOCATES FOR DISADVANTAGED GROUPS
             IF INVITED BY THE PATIENT AND/OR THE PROXIES



Go to other dangers, mistakes, & abuses of the right-to-die.











The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author.
The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.