Seven Suggestions for
Sermons on the Internet
by James Park

1. USE DESCRIPTIVE TITLES AND SUBTITLES.

    For reasons beyond my ken,
some UU preachers seem to prefer
ambiguous, puzzling, & enigmatic titles.
If we want to attract surfers on the Internet,
the titles and subtitles must be descriptive and enticing.
I suggest making our titles as precise as possible.
Here is one example of an organized list of good sermon titles:
http://www.tc.umn.edu/~parkx032/SERMONS.html
Adding subtitles is usually helpful.


2. BEGIN WITH A SYNOPSIS AND/OR OUTLINE.

    Surfers on the Internet are not committed ahead of time
to reading a whole sermon
(as is the case of people sitting in the congregation).
We have literally thousands of other things
that we could read on the Internet
(including other UU sermons)
using the same 15 minutes of our lives.

    After the descriptive title,
a short synposis of what the sermon contains
will seduce us into reading that sermon
if it seems likely to address issues already alive in our minds.
In many cases, such a synopsis has already been created
in the process of planning and announcing a particular sermon.

    Such a synopsis need not be used as part
of the actual sermon as presented to the congregation,
but it will serve as a good introduction to readers on the Internet.

    Some congregational webmasters already follow this practice:
The sermon list itself (which gives the titles of sermons)
contains a one-paragraph synopsis right after each title.
Then surfers do not even need to click the sermon title
to find out more about the content.
Simply by reading the titles and the synopses,
we can decide which sermons to read.
A few examples of synopses and outlines will be found here:
http://www.tc.umn.edu/~parkx032/YO.html

    If your sermons are presented in audio or video format,
a written synopsis will help surfers
to select the most interesting sermons.


3. INCLUDE SUB-DIVISIONS IN THE POSTED TEXT.

    When a sermon is crafted,
the minister knows the various points
and illustrations that make up the sermon.
These may be explicitly contained in the outline.
If these headings are included in the posted sermon,
they will guide Internet readers from section to section.
And if we the readers want to read only one part of a sermon,
we can go directly to that most interesting part.

    These sub-divisions of the sermon
can be displayed on the screen in CAPITALS, bold face
larger size, a different font, or even in color.
Be experimental; see what readers like the best.
The text you are reading names the seven suggestions
in CAPITALS and
red.


4. USE THE WHOLE SCREEN.

    When we are posting shorter items,
it makes sense to keep the table of contents
for the whole website present somewhere on the screen.
But I find such extra information distracting
when I am trying to read a sermon.

    You should also remember that not everyone has a large screen.
Some of us are still using screens that are only 12 inches wide.
Thus, the contents or index strip down one side of the screen
might occupy 1/3 of the screen,
leaving very little space for the text of the sermon.

    Also, if you do not divide the lines of your text, but simply let them be wraped by the computer, they could become very long on a very large computer screen.

    Instead of keeping part of the screen
for links to related parts of your website,
put all your related links after the end of the sermon.
If you have used meta names for each sermon
(see Suggestion #6 below),
some people will come to your site first to a particular sermon.
Then the surfer might want to know more about your congregation.


5. DIVIDE LINES ACCORDING TO MEANING.

    You have been experiencing these line-divisions thru-out this text:
Each sentence begins on the left.
When a sentence is too long for one line,
it is broken in the most logical place for easy reading on a screen.

    Here again, it might be too much work
to insert such meaningful line-divisions
into sermons already posted on the Internet,
but preachers might discover after a bit of practice
that this is an excellent way to compose a sermon in the first place.

    When the author selects the line-length, rather than the computer,
the author can use line-divisions to organize lists
and to emphasize points of importance.


6. CLASSIFY SERMONS BY SUBJECT.

    Only a few websites do this already.
When more than 50 sermons are listed,
reading thru the titles could become an unwelcoming task.
Instead of merely listing them chronologically,
it might make sense to organize them by similar themes.
This will be especially helpful for potential readers
who know what subjects they are looking for.
Here are some common themes of UU sermons:
DEATH, LOVE, MARRIAGE, MEANING,
PARENTHOOD, SEXUAL ORIENTATION
SIMPLICITY, SPIRITUALITY, & VALUES.

    These 9 subjects are just a few
of the standard subject classifications
used by the Library of Congress.
(There are over 200,000.)
You will find over a hundred of the most useful subject headings here:
http://www.tc.umn.edu/~parkx032/LC-SUB.html

    If more webmasters and preachers
classify their sermons by subject,
the Subject Listings part of the Cyber-Sermon Registry
will become much more useful to surfers on the Internet:
We who use the Internet to find interesting ideas
will be able to click a subject on this list
and immediately be taken to a collection of UU sermons
on the subject we have chosen.
Here is the beginning of the Subject Listing
of UU sermons on the Internet
---using the Library of Congress Subject Headings:
http://www.tc.umn.edu/~parkx032/FCS-LC.html

    It is probably too much to ask
to have past sermons classified or re-classified
according to the Library of Congress system,
but we are now at the dawn of Internet communication.
Preachers and webmasters who see the potential of the Internet
will consider classifying at least their future sermons
according to this standard system.
If a particular sermon were a book,
how would it be classified by the Library of Congress?

    In this connection, it may be necessary to separate
the recent sermons from the permanent sermons.
Many websites post just the last few sermons.
These will be removed from the website
and replaced by newer sermons in a month or two.
There is no point in classifying these short-lived sermons.
But sermons that are going to remain on the website indefinitely
could benefit from being classified and listed in
the Subject Listing of the Cyber-Sermon Registry:
http://www.tc.umn.edu/~parkx032/LC-SUB.html
Ministers and webmasters may be able to determine
by the amount of feedback stimulated by each sermon
just which ones deserve the immortality
of being added to the permanent collection.

    If you classify sermons for your own collection,
put the Library of Congress classification for each sermon
in the TITLE LINE of that computer file.
The TITLE LINE appears at the very top of your computer screen.
The TITLE LINE for the file you are now reading
says UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST CHURCHES.
An accurate and descriptive TITLE LINE
will help Internet surfers to go directly to that sermon.

    If you use other meta tags for each computer file,
the classification tag can have more than one
Library of Congress subject.
If you view the page source of this file,
you will find these classification tags:
UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST CHURCHES &
INTERNET (Computer Network),
which are both Library of Congress classifications.

    The keyword meta tag allows you to add
other possible ways people might be likely
to discover your sermon on the Internet.
The keywords for this file are "UU sermons" and "Internet".

    Classifying each sermon as it is posted
will require 5 or 10 minutes additional work,
but if only one additional persons finds that sermon
because of your diligence, it will have been worth it.
After all, how many hours have you already devoted to this sermon?
Doesn't it deserve to be more widely read?


7. PROVIDE REFERENCES IN THE TEXT OR  IN FOOTNOTES.

    When a sermon is presented verbally,
it would not be appropriate to give
complete bibliographical information
about every book or article used or mentioned in the sermon.
But on the Internet, this is easy to do.
And it will be very helpful to readers
who want to read more about any particular theme.

    Some UU preachers are already including references
in the Internet version of their sermons.
Others should follow suit.
And if there are other resources on the same theme
already available on the Internet,
put in hyper-links to these as well.
Internet readers love to be able to click such resources immediately,
rather than going to the library or the bookstore.

    And the most scholarly UU sermons
include annotated bibliographies at the end.
Congratuations to all UU preachers
who give such guidance for further reading.
Here is one example of a cyber-sermon
linked with an extensive annotated bibliography:
http://www.tc.umn.edu/~parkx032/CY-SSF.html


    Additional suggestions will always be welcome.
Send all responses to the webmaster: James Park
PARKx032@TC.UMN.EDU

    We are also looking for a congregational website
that already follows all or most of these suggestions.
If you know of a webmaster and/or minister
who has done an especially good job
of posting sermons on the Internet,
please nominate that site,
so that it can be mentioned here.
Other webmasters and/or ministers
may be inspired to follow such examples.


Return to the Cyber-Sermon Registry .


Return to the beginning of the UNITARIAN UNIVERSALISM page.


Return to the beginning of this home page:
An Existential Philosopher's Museum .









The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author.
The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.