Loneliness is an aching
void in the center of our beings,
a deep longing to love and be loved,
to be fully known and accepted by at
least one other person.
It is a hollow, haunting sound sweeping
thru our depths,
chilling our bones and causing us to
shiver.
Is
there a person,
anywhere,
who has never felt the stab of loneliness,
who has never experienced
the eerie distance of isolation and separation,
who has never suffered the pain of rejection
or the loss of love?
The
final rupture or
breakdown of a valued loving relationship,
the sudden death of someone who was close
and special,
an unavoidable separation from a loved
one
—these things strike loneliness into
our hearts,
the intense experience of the absence
of that specific person.
Besides longing for a specific person,
sometimes loneliness
has no name attached.
This is the general feeling of being
alone,
isolated, separated from others.
And
there is a third
kind of loneliness—existential loneliness—
which is even deeper and more pervasive
than either of the first two.
It often disguises itself as longing
for a specific person
or pretends to be yearning for contact
with anyone,
but this deeper lack or emptiness-of-being
is not really a kind of loneliness at
all.
Being together with other people, even
people we intensely love,
does not overcome this deep incompleteness
of being.
This inner default of selfhood has never
been solved by relationships,
no matter how good and close and warm
our relationships might be.
OUTLINE:
I. Five Differences
between
Interpersonal Loneliness and Existential Loneliness
II. How Does it Feel to be Existentially Lonely?
III. Beyond Existential
Loneliness
Whatever the state
of our relationships
—whether close and warm, boring and cool,
or non-existent—
we should distinguish our experience
of interpersonal loneliness
from the much deeper, more central, loneliness of spirit.
Loneliness
of spirit is really a void within ourselves,
a hollowness that cannot be filled
with other people
—no matter how close, warm, & fulfilling
our relationships might be.
The yearning we feel is real; it comes
from the depths of our selves.
But love is not the answer to
this existential yearning.
Fusing with another person will not solve
all our problems.
If our real problem is our Existential
Malaise—felt as loneliness—
even the most ideal loving relationship
will not fill this aching void.
For
a time, probably,
love will cover our inner emptiness,
but after the initial period of emotional
excitement is over,
our fundamental hollowness will make
itself felt again.
Then we might blame each
other for our alienation.
We might respond to the reappearance of
loneliness
by changing partners.
With a new person to love, we can become
lost in romance again,
forgetting momentarily our inner incompleteness
of being.
The
belief that 'true
love' will solve our Existential Dilemma
is one of the strongest illusions of
the Western world.
Perhaps only a series of disappointments
will convince us
that love cannot solve our loneliness of spirit.
I.
Five Differences between
Interpersonal Loneliness and Existential Loneliness
1. Both
the longing for a
specific person and the general urge
to make connections with others are clearly
interpersonal
feelings.
But existential loneliness only seems
to be yearning for love.
Even the best love will not abolish our loneliness of spirit.
After a while, the inner lack or hollowness
gnaws thru again.
2.
Interpersonal loneliness
results from being isolated and alone.
When we reunite with the people we love,
our loneliness disappears.
But when being together with the people
we love
does not overcome our 'loneliness',
it might be loneliness of spirit.
We might feel 'lonely', incomplete, &
unfulfilled
even when we are receiving all the loving
we could ask for.
Nothing others can do will abolish this
'loneliness'
because the problem is inward rather
than interpersonal.
3.
Interpersonal loneliness
is usually temporary;
when our relationships improve, this
loneliness disappears.
But loneliness of spirit is a permanent
condition of our beings.
Independent of the ups and downs of our
love-lives,
our inward loneliness remains—a persistent
lack of wholeness.
4.
Interpersonal loneliness
affects only one part of our lives.
But existential loneliness affects every
dimension of existence.
We feel incomplete, inadequate, miserable
in everything.
5.
We know how to
cure
interpersonal loneliness: Find people.
It is seldom easy to create good
personal relationships,
but at least we know some appropriate
ways
to open ourselves to others.
But rearranging our relationships
will not cure our existential loneliness.
In fact, we might be disappointed to feel
essentially 'lonely'
even when our relationships are going quite well.
Our central hollowness remains unfulfilled
no matter what the state of our personal
relationships.
II. How Does it Feel to be Existentially Lonely?
Loneliness of spirit
is discovered in our depths.
Sometimes, when we least expect it, loneliness
freezes
us.
Or perhaps it feels like the bottom dropping
out of our being.
We feel incomplete, as if something important
is missing.
We feel shaky and insecure inside, weak
and 'clingy'.
Sometimes this gnawing deficiency makes
us want to 'devour' others
—to get as much of them as possible,
to complete our egos by possessing them.
Or we might seek to be supported and protected
by others.
III. Beyond Existential Loneliness
However, our loneliness of spirit can be cured
—independent of our personal relationships.
If our interior hollowness is filled,
we no longer use other persons
to plug-up our inner emptiness and fill-in
our deficiencies of being.
Instead of trying to fit other people
into our interior gap,
we find ourselves loving
from a deep richness, fullness, & completeness.
We are empowered to give to others
without expecting anything in return.
Altho each person's
journey toward this liberation is individual,
we can, nevertheless, distinguish three
movements within our spirits:
1. We separate interpersonal loneliness
from existential loneliness.
2. We abandon our former attempts to
solve our Malaise by love.
3. We leap across the Abyss
and find ourselves freed from
loneliness of spirit.
If
our problem is really existential rather than interpersonal,
we need an existential solution,
rather than a psychological method of
healing.
The same inner sensitivity and subjectivity
that enabled us to grapple with our existential
loneliness
can now help us to grope our individual
ways to Existential Freedom.
Just
how we enter the
new condition of wholeness
will probably always remain a mystery.
Each of us can only try to become sensitive
to those interior moments
when we spontaneously find ourselves
whole and filled.
If we learn how to attune ourselves better
to such moments of peace,
we might discover how to be so that
such moments will return.
The
surprising way
in which Existential Freedom happens to us
tells us that this new way of being it
is not
a latent personality characteristic now
blooming.
So when we find ourselves living beyond
existential loneliness,
we are not tempted to be proud,
as if it were a personal achievement.
Our new completeness is not the
result of strenuous internal efforts.
The transformation comes precisely when
we give up striving.
And that might be all we will ever know
about the process:
how we orient ourselves internally to
enable completeness to come.
When
we discover how
to open ourselves to this gift,
our hollow yearning is filled, our loneliness of spirit is cured.
In that very place in our depths where
we used to feel
empty, lacking, deficient, incomplete,
lonely, & needy,
we now find ourselves satisfied and full.
This
new fulfillment
empowers us to love in a new way.
Instead of trying to use others to fill
our aching existential Void,
we can now appreciate them for the
persons they really are.
We no longer need to cling to
others
because their absence does not throw
us back into loneliness of spirit.
If
we discover how
to live beyond existential loneliness,
we are empowered to love from fullness
rather than emptiness.
|
Interpersonal
Loneliness
|
Existential
Loneliness
|
| 1. Human isolation,
separation, lack of relationship. |
1. Incompleteness of being, lack of wholeness. |
| 2. Results from being alone; social cause. |
2. Primordial
incompleteness of self; inward source. |
| 3. Comes and goes with the rise and fall of relationships. |
3. Permanent lack of
completeness, even within love. |
| 4. Limited to the
interpersonal dimension of life. |
4. Taints every aspect of
life; cannot be isolated. |
| 5. Solved by communication, sharing, closeness, love. |
5. Cannot be overcome by
love; incompleteness, unfulfillment continues. |
1. Have you ever felt lonely for one specific person?
2. Have you also felt the general desire to have more human contact?
3. Have you believed that love is the answer to your Existential Malaise?
4. To what extent have
you tried to solve
your loneliness of spirit
by trying to create
better loving relationships?
5. If you are not yet
convinced,
what additional experiences
are likely to convince you
that love cannot cure loneliness of spirit?
6. In what ways does our culture say that love is the answer?
7. How realistic are the images of love in movies, music, etc.?
8. Have you ever
experienced existential
loneliness
even in the midst
of a wonderful loving relationship?
9. What part of your
'urge to merge' with
another person
is really your underlying existential loneliness?
10. Does continued
existential loneliness
sometimes cause relationships to end?
11. Where are you in
your journey
from loneliness to
Existential Freedom?
12. Has Existential
Freedom enabled you
to love without clinging?
James Park
is an existential
philosopher.
This cyber-sermon is adapted from
Chapter 1 of his small book
Opening to
Grace: Transcending Our
Spiritual Malaise
.
All rights reserved.
Much more information about James Park
will be found on his home page:
An
Existential Philosopher's Museum
.
WRITE
TO THE AUTHOR
OF THIS CYBER-SERMON
James
Park welcomes
your questions and comments at:
PARKx032@TC.UMN.EDU
Questions
from
Readers and Answers from the Author
about
"Loneliness of Spirit: Deeper than the Reach of Love"
Further Reading on Loneliness of Spirit and its Solution
James Park Our
Existential Predicament:
Loneliness,
Depression, Anxiety, & Death
[Minneapolis, MN:
www.existentialbooks.com, 2006--5th edition]
Chapter 1, "Existential Loneliness" p.
25-38.
James Park New
Ways of Loving:
How Authenticity Transforms Relationships
[Minneapolis, MN:
www.existentialbooks.com, 2007--6th edition]
Chapter 13 "Love
Among Existentially Free People" p. 224-231.
James Park Opening
to Grace:
Transcending Our Spiritual Malaise
.
(Chapter 1 of this book is available
on-line:
Interpersonal
Loneliness & Spiritual Loneliness
.
For several other
background books,
click:
Books
on Existential Spirituality
.
For a one-page outline
of a presentation
of this same subject,
click the following title:
Loneliness
of Spirit: Deeper than the Reach of Love
.
Many of the above links
and a few others are available here:
The Existential
Loneliness Portal
FORWARD
THIS CYBER-SERMON
TO
OTHERS WHO MAY
WANT TO READ IT
Cyber-sermons are released by the First UU Church of the Internet
with
the explicit
plan of being short enough to be forwarded to others.
So, of all the people in your computer's address book,
which
ones would
most appreciate this cyber-sermon.
Perhaps
you have
3 or 5 friends in cyber-space
who
would benefit
from reading this cyber-sermon.
If you
genuinely
can recommend the contents of this cyber-sermon
to
these specific
people, forward it to them.
You
might include
a note explaining
why
you believe
this cyber-sermon would be interesting to them.
THE
AUTHOR ALONE
IS RESPONSIBLE
FOR
THE OPINIONS
EXPRESSED IN THIS CYBER-SERMON
The individual
author of each cyber-sermon bears primary responsibility
for all the facts and opinions it contains.
Each subsequent individual or organization
that re-distributes cyber-sermons
cannot be held responsible for errors
of fact
or controversial opinions cyber-sermons
might contain.
Persons who are not
familiar with Unitarian Universalism
are hereby informed that UUism is a decentralized,
creed-free, liberal religious movement.
There is no UU Pope, no UU Bible, and
no UU dogma.
There are several traditions
from which UUism springs,
but these do not limit individual freedom
of belief—or non-belief.
(For more information, see the home
page
of the Unitarian Universalist Association: http://uua.org
.)
Thus, no central authority
has reviewed
the thoughts contained in any
cyber-sermon
—or in any sermon delivered to any
local
UU congregation.
Cyber-sermons reflect the views of
their
authors.
They should not be taken to
represent
the views of any religious body.
Return to the index
page for the First
UU Church of the Internet
.
Go to other
cyber-sermons by James Park,
organized into 9 subject-areas.
Go to the opening page
for Free
Cyber-Sermons
.
Return to the UNITARIAN UNIVERSALISM page.
Go to the opening page
for this website:
An
Existential Philosopher's Museum